In a national first, a new Washington, D.C. law grants legal parenthood to both women of a couple who plan a child together using donor insemination.
More specifically:
When a woman bears a child conceived by artificial insemination, and her spouse or unmarried partner consents in writing to the insemination, the consenting spouse or partner is a legal parent. That person’s name will appear as a parent on the child’s birth certificate. With the enactment of this measure, the District has become the first jurisdiction in the country to enact a statute specifically providing children born through artificial insemination with two legal parents from the beginning even when those parents are a same-sex or different-sex unmarried couple. . . .
The new law also establishes that when a woman in a registered domestic partnership bears a child, her domestic partner is the presumed parent of the child and the partner’s name will appear on the child’s birth certificate. [Via NCLR.]
An Oregon case last week came to a similar conclusion as regards donor insemination. This is the first such legislative move. (States where same-sex partners can marry or have a civil union or equivalent domestic partnership will usually put both moms on the birth certificate only if they are married or CU’d/DP’d.)
Nancy Polikoff has all the details at her blog, and was involved in drafting the legislation, so she knows whereof she speaks. She even explores what the new law means for adoptive families and gay dads who have a child through surrogacy. (Short answer: Not much, although other D.C. statutes may consider partners to be “de facto” parents.)
Furthermore, she notes, the new law states that “a semen donor is not a parent unless he and the birth mother have an agreement in writing saying that he is.” Such legal clarity will help avoid problems like this.
She also wisely adds: “Lesbian and gay family law is complex, especially when families relocate. I still advise lesbian couples to meet with a lawyer before their child is born. Although not required for parentage under DC law, a court order confirming the nonbiological mother’s status will make that status more secure across the whole country.”
Thanks to Nancy and all of the others who helped make this happen, and congratulations to all the families in D.C. who will benefit.
At this point, we tend to use our son’s birth certificate (with both of our names on it) instead of the adoption decree. I think that’s all we needed to get his passport. So I wonder how much of a difference the court order would make. I’ve also wondered how the court order differs from a standard adoption decree, both in terms of the process and the cost.
Court orders, including adoption decrees, are subject to the “full faith and credit” requirement, so they’re supposedly portable across state lines (see http://www.mombian.com/2009/05/13/breaking-florida-appeals-court/). But I don’t know about birth certificates.
My understanding (and I’m not a lawyer, so check with one) is that birth certificates naming the non-bio mom as a parent are not necessarily portable across state lines, because the non-bio mom’s right to be on them relies on her relationship to the bio mom–and that relationship may not be recognized in other states.
You may have missed this when reading because it’s one sentence in the whole release:
“A similar law goes into effect January 1, 2010 in New Mexico. ”
We had no idea that was happening and have seen no press on it here in NM. We’re trying to get in touch with NCLR to find out more. Regardless, we will be doing a second parent adoption for travel within the US. The birth certificate is usually good enough for border crossings to Canada but we always carry the birth certificate AND adoption decree when traveling.
Pingback: Mombian » Blog Archive » LGBT Parenting Roundup
Pingback: Mombian » Blog Archive » LGBT Parenting Update
Pingback: Mombian » Blog Archive » Huge Win for De Facto Parents in Delaware
Pingback: Jane and Jane Magazine, Celebrating Lesbian Living